Supreme Court of Cassation with a new case on complicity and non-pecuniary damages
The Supreme Court of Cassation ruled a new interpretative decision on a matter concerning a claim for non-pecuniary damages from a tort and complicity
With it, the supreme judges answered whether, when assessing the amount of compensation, if an objection is made to the victim's complicity in the damage, the court is limited only to the amount sought by the plaintiff, by which to reduce the complicity or not.
The Supreme Court unanimously accepted that the court's assessment of the amount of fair compensation for non-pecuniary damages from a tort is not limited by the stated claim, but an amount exceeding that requested in the claim cannot be awarded.
What does all this mean?
Let's say I'm an injured passenger in a Road accident, when it is found that I was not wearing my seat belt. Then it turns out that I contributed to the harm occurring to me by not wearing my seat belt.
If I caused part of the damage to myself, it is not fair for the at-fault driver or his insurer to cover the part for which I am responsible. Therefore, when determining compensation, the court (only if the defendant has made an objection of complicity) should take this circumstance into account and reduce the compensation to achieve a balance of responsibilities.
Usually the courts determine between 10% to 25% co-inflict for not wearing a seat belt, and in extremely rare cases it may increase to 55%-60%. This percentage reduces the amount of compensation that should be received by the injured party.
В горния пример, ако съдът определи, че вредите, които съм претърпял в следствие на инцидент, са в размер на 10 000 лева и определи 25% съпричиняване, ще осъди виновния водач или неговия застраховател да плати крайна сума в размер на 7 500 лева.
Да речем обаче, че аз съм претендирал 5 000 лева като обезщетение за вредите. Тълкувателното решение казва, че съдът не е обвързан с това мое твърдение, но не може да присъди повече от тези 5 000 лева дори и при отчетено съпричиняване.
More about co-causing and its consequences, you can find here.
To help us assess the case faster, prepare the key facts before you submit:
- When and where the incident happened.
- What exactly happened and who was involved.
- What injuries, treatment or material damages followed.
- Whether you have documents such as reports, medical papers, photos or insurance information.